Paying Up

As a conservative and a man of character, I pay my debts (unlike the country which simply keeps borrowing more and more money).

So, I manned up, and paid off the bet:

 

Now if Democrats are serious about wanting to work across the aisle and actually get something done over the next 4 years, we’re going to need some genuine bi-partisanship. I think a great symbolic gesture of bi-partisanship would be for Jim to ALSO shave his head.

Unfortunately, so far it seems like Democrats are more interested in gloating over their win than earning any good will with the Republicans they’re going to have to work with… I’d love to be proven wrong though!

Fool Me Once…

Fool Me Twice, Shame on Me

Electoral College Prediction from PolitigraphsJim

Obama 289 – Romney 249

2012 Electoral Prediction

Map created with CNN’s Interactive Electoral Map

In 2012 Your Vote Means Something

Political pundits across the nation have been talking about the incredibly high stakes for 2012 election but none of them had any idea they’d get THIS high:

Full disclosure: The terms of the bet do not require a complete shaving of my head. I can keep a quarter inch or so of ground cover.

That’s right folks, we at Politigraphs have a friendly wager going that will result in one of us shaving.

If (read as: when) Mitt Romney wins, the old man will shave his head including cutting off the ponytail he’s had for decades. Many would argue this should have happened several years ago, but it appears our long national nightmare may soon come to an end.

If the unthinkable should occur and President Obama is re-elected, I’ll be shaving my face and will once again look like an Oatmeal character. Trust me folks, this is NOT a good look for me.

So when you step into the voting booth on November 6th (my birthday by the way), remember what’s at stake for our nation.

The Loser

Ben Shaved

Are You Better Off Now Than You Were Four Years Ago?

Better Off Now Than 4 Years Ago

Copy the code below and paste into your site to share this politigraph.

A quick look at the graph above would indicate the answer is no. Income is lower and prices are moderately higher. Home prices have fallen and the poverty rate has risen. The odd man out in this scenario is consumer sentiment which has risen sharply compared to four years ago (although still not near the 1996 baseline).

The answer to the disparity between reality and consumer sentiment may be that  consumers are looking at recent trends as opposed to comparing two snapshots in time. Four years ago we were in the midst of a recession whose worst effects were yet to come. Today we are in a very slow economic recovery. Whether the pace of that recovery is enough to reassure voters who aren’t as well off as they were four years ago remains to be seen.

Rose-Colored Glasses and the (Unintended) Consequences of Elections

The 2012 election presents us with a bit of a quandary. Conventional wisdom states that America is a center-right country and has been drifting further right since the Reagan years. In addition unemployment is high, the economy is struggling and the majority of Americans believe the country is headed in the wrong direction. 2012 should be a banner year for Republicans and a disaster for the incumbent Democratic president. And yet the polls show Obama beginning to widen his lead over Romney and the odds for Republicans capturing the Senate dwindling.

Republicans – and Democrats – are left wondering how such a thing is possible.

The answer may be the rose-red colored glasses through which the far right views the world.

Every setback is blamed on the liberal media, skewed polling or candidates that didn’t run as “true conservatives.” Every victory is a mandate for the far right’s agenda and a purging of moderate elements within the Republican Party. The latest example is the 2010-midterm elections. The far right’s mantra became, “elections have consequences.” Sometimes, as the Republicans are learning, those consequences are not what they intended.

House seats lost by president's party in first-term, midterm elections

Midterm Elections

 

As the chart above shows, in a non-rose-colored reality, the results of midterm elections during a president’s first term appear to have no value as a predictor of his likelihood of being reelected. Ignoring history, the far right claimed the 2010 elections as a great repudiation of Obama, the “Liberal Agenda” and even moderate Republicans.

The results are a paralyzed and unloved (10% approval rating) Congress and a string of extreme-right presidential candidates (Bachmann, Cain, Gingrich and Santorum) whose only distinction was their inability to win even within the Republican Party. What they did accomplish was to convince more electable candidates that 2012 wasn’t a good year to be remotely moderate within the Republican Party.

And so the Republicans are left with Mitt Romney whose efforts to find love among a base that refuses to embrace him has alienated many of the moderate voters he needs to be elected. It’s not too late for him “go rogue” and to turn things around but, in the Republican Party of 2012, truly going rogue would mean a sharp turn towards the center and I don’t see that happening.

President Obama, Please Stop Lying About Romney’s Tax Rate

A politician lying is certainly nothing new, but when President Obama throws out a whopper as big as this one we can’t help but point out the fact that it’s a blatant lie. As our graph below clearly illustrates, no cop or teacher making $50k pays an effective tax rate higher than Mitt Romney’s 14.1%. And, one of the few deductions you get to claim on TOP of the standard deduction (which according to the IRS roughly 70% of people use) just happens to be educator expenses which means a teacher making $50k pays an even lower rate than illustrated in our graph.

Mr. President, please stop lying about Mitt Romney's effective tax rates.


Debunking President Obama's Lie about Romney's Taxes

President Obama Kept More 2011 Income than Romney

Yesterday, President Obama’s social media team posted this gem of a tweet:

https://twitter.com/barackobama/status/250327997314387968

The President has continually attacked his opponent for not doing his “fair share.” What you WON’T hear from the President is the fact that Mitt Romney donated over 29% of his 2011 income to charities.

In fact, between taxes & charitable donations President Obama paid LESS in 2011 than Mitt Romney!


Giving Back: Presidential Income Tax & Giving Rates

President Obama Explaining Why He’ll be a One Term President

National Debt Growth by Presidential Term